The in focus area is not flat but shaped like an umbrella with the center as the middle. If everybody would refuse to pay these exorbitant prices then the cost would come down but there's a sucker born every minute. Photo by Carey Rose; ISO 800, 1/125 sec, F4, If you're a fan of lens flare, you're in luck. Maximum image quality in a pocket-sized camera. That doesn't mean a camera like X-T2 couldn't do the job, having half of the weight.Third: Cuz Rx1rII still overpriced (doesn't have the "brand/handcrafting" value of Leica) and flawed camera. Other systems might have CA correction on by default and you might not even realize. The RX1Rii might be great for 4'x6' prints but how many of us do that? miksto - sounds to me like you didn't do your research up front. 42.4-million-pixel full-frame Exmor R back-illuminated CMOS sensor; ISO 100-25,600 native, ISO 50-102,400 expanded; 35mm f/2 Zeiss Sonnar T* lens; Pop-up OLED EVF with 2.4-million-dot resolution; Tilting 3in LCD with 1,228,800-dot resolution; 399 phase-detection AF points Still 35mm, unchaged aspect. The technology is superb but continually held back by poor ergonomic design and user interface. And I'd be much less interested in making photos. In bright daylight conditions, that’s not fast enough for the f/2 large aperture. The Canon Powershot Zoom is a product in a class of its own: part camera and part digital monocular. But its real issues are: fragility, too small size and battery. So just set Lightroom to zoom to 50% instead, or whatever you're using. Check out our sample gallery and decide for yourself. (Sarcasm :) ). Ten eerste is de beeldkwaliteit met een grote sensor veel hoger. 2) the reviews I have read tell that the sensor and the lens are a match made in Heaven. I fix them and resell them, they are almost always defective, they were all unreliable. Absolutely. You are partially correct. If you want a small FF camera your going to have to compromise somewhere. We talk about a tool here - camera. I have an RX1R & can certainly avow that the Carl Zeiss 35mm f:/2.0 lens is an amazing piece of sharp glass. Image cropped to taste. Say, Panny LX100? >> As well you say, the DxO team have not teated this lens yet, so why quote the outgoing combo' ? Image quality? And the downsides are less tolerance for camera shake (the original was great for very steady shooting but also good for a more run and gun kind of street shooting that I do a lot of - 42mp is less forgiving for the latter), the heavy overhead for storage space and processing the raw files, and I gotta think all of that resolution and the processing needed to harness it has something to do with the even worse battery life than the original. The camera also temporarily bricked on me (before battery exhuastion). The Sony RX1R II is a premium compact camera with a 42.4-megapixel full-frame sensor, variable optical low-pass filter, a Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm f/2 lens and a built-in electronic viewfinder for eye-level shooting. I haven't heard that dust on the sensors of fixed lens cameras is a major issue. Autofocus is dependable in good light. So from that point of view even A7R II is not yet the ultimate sharpness benchmark but we have no better right now ON THE SAME SENSOR and RX1R II loses in sharpness. I never said anybody else should agree. Can you shoot most wildlife, BIF? But having just a 35mm lens is a bit restrictive for landscape use. At f/8 and 1/500s should be even easier. It promises absolutely excellent image quality in a package that fits into your coat pocket, but so-so handling, large file sizes, a clunky user interface and short battery life will turn off some users. The Sony RX1R II is a premium compact camera with a 42.4-megapixel full-frame sensor, variable optical low-pass filter, a Zeiss Sonnar T* 35mm f/2 lens and a built-in electronic viewfinder for eye-level shooting. As far as the overpricing part - it's basically a $3200 A7r II in a smaller form factor with a $1000+ Zeiss 35mm/f2 lens glued onto it. How is this not discussed at all in the review? It is razor sharp on the 42.4 megapixel sensor! I recommend using the camera instead of writing nonsense. (apparently many people here only understand things if we explain in the most literal way).".. >> putting long lenses on the a7R range is simply missing the point of the cameras IMHO. But I had a lot of out of focus images where I aimed for impromptu shots of my kids etc. After a flurry of camera announcements from Sony towards the end of 2015 we were not expecting any big launches. So in the end, who is the RX1R II for? 'What's the best mirrorless camera?' I would not like to see them replace tactile electro-mechanical controls. Use the manual focusing, and save even more battery.Turn off the WiFi.Airplane mode too, "What is the aim of this brutally expensive camera ?". But a smartphone does, just like your $1000 (!) DPR repeat this statement a few times. You don't need a heavy tripod. Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. We're glad you asked. What is the problem ? Find out in our field review. Ahead of this year's virtual CES, Dell has announced new additions to its UltraSharp family of monitors, including a 40" curved 5K monitor. Tiny body, 35mm lens. I agree, the wheels on the Ricoh GRD are fast and responsive. I think I got it.But it's important to clarify that it's not the ideal street camera for the way YOU shoot. It's hard to imagine the RX1R II as a main video camera, but it would function rather well as a B-Roll-focused addition to an established video system as long as you don't need 4K. (Source: Sony.) I reckon it is poor quality optics on RX1R II as that is what is different. For example, when you compare the two cameras’ resolution and high ISO performance using DPReview’s image comparison tool, the differences, though noticeable, don’t seem all that dramatic. With the same 42MP BSI CMOS sensor from the Sony a7R II, the RX1R II also inherits that camera's sophisticated on-sensor PDAF system with 399 autofocus points. I worried about RX-1 dust but it has not been an issue for >2 years. RX series fills a need for someone. I dont think the lens are interchangeable. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. Ex-Microsoft CEO killing all lines of product and selling out to Microsoft with shaky and unproven mobile OS had nothing to do with Nokia downfall, nothing at all. De lens van de Cyber-shot RX1R II heeft alle kenmerken van glas aan de bovenkant, waarbij het blauwe Zeiss-logo aan de zijkant één weggeefactie is. It's just a great camera now, and I've no complaints. I yearn for a camera that I can operate with minimal effort, so I can focus my attention instead on my subject. Not the advent of amazing new mobile computing software from Apple then Google? No. I'd rather have the Q, because it has real manual focussing with the ability to zone focus and because of this, it is a better street camera. I even wrote clearly:"And please, don't missunderstand this, as I if I was saying that H6D-100c is the ideal camera for streets. (that's what killed Nokia's cellphones). Your argument is flawed. NO. I have no issues with using the control wheel. Some days ago I bought this camera, the RX-1 R II.It's a great camera with fascinating image quality. Oh wait, you don't own one so you should not be sharing your opinion on it. Otherwise DXO Mark clearly indicates Sony does not have native E-mount lenses with resolution to match 42 megapixel sensor. I personally find touch screens annoying, a joy stick control maybe, but that also might get in the way. I've seen little evidence of this. Answer is obvious: heat issue, weak battery issue, crippled design issue. Done that several times with the RX1R and were never disappointed.I experienced the Zeiss Sonnar 35mm F2.0 as an excellent lens that rivals the Sony Zeiss 55mm F1.8. Like Olympus' OM-D line of cameras, we recommend taking some time to figure out exactly how you want to use the camera to achieve an optimal set up, and then leaving it that way. You just hate Sony and are looking for a reason. What’s the best camera costing over $2500? I had a spare of course, but even so I'm used to way more from my DSLR and ILC cameras. Find out in our initial review. I am guessing since you are here it is option 1. To call the optics of the Zeiss Sonnar poor is not knowing what you are talking about, I'm afraid. 1) putting long lenses on the a7R range is simply missing the point of the cameras IMHO. With simple lossless (not lossy) compression. Our theory is that in S-AF, the camera uses a combination of its CDAF and PDAF systems, using PDAF to get near the point of focus, and CDAF to fine tune it. You are the only one claiming there are "poor optics" in this camera. BlinkAI's patented AI-powered image enhancement technology works alongside the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC inside the Mi 11 smartphone to get the most out of low-light video footage. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R review – Introduction. The image quality is excellent. If you don't, you won't, and they won't. Productprijs: € 4.199,-Pakketpost - Voor 23.59 besteld, morgen gratis thuisbezorgd! This edition of the 'Absolute beginner’s guide to film photography' will cover the bare necessities – what you need to get started. En uiteraard het verschil in scherptediepte. Front view of the Cyber-shot RX1R II. This came right from your boys on the RX1Rii. I don't see any meaningful fall off in sharpness toward the edges at infinity. What's the best camera for travel? Historically, fixed lens cameras (be they folders, rangefinders, or SLRs) have always been less expensive, not more. The Powershot Zoom can't compete with pro cameras for image quality, though it sure does fit in your pocket. It will now make it easier for travelers to legally fly. The a7r mk1&2 are bigger, the combo of this lens and this RX1Rii body is supposed to be a perfect combo. "The problem with the RX1r II is that it is focus by wire and there are no focal length markings, making zone focussing near impossible.". So while this doesn't hamper the accuracy of the excellent 399-point PDAF system from the a7R II, it does hamper outright speed compared to some of the faster focusing FE-mount lenses in Sony's lineup. Go watch this video on the Master, Daido Moriyama and it may make things clearer why all cameras aren't really suited to street photography... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCL1SnIYZUw&t=185s. "If only Sony had made the battery door removable, allowing for a small external grip to improve ergonomics as well as accompany a larger battery. Simply daft. Your review states that the EVF quality can be adjusted on the RX1r2 to the "120fps mode". Researchers at the University of Arizona have used NASA's HiRISE camera, which is onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, to capture high-resolution images of the Valles Marineris canyon on Mars. Not a point and shoot. This is the kind of stock reserved for the most capable of Sony pro lenses. The RX1R II inherits the ZEISS 35mm F2 lens from its predecessors, and this is largely a good thing. Just reread your comments, carefully. People who buy it are not looking for interchangeable lenses. By the way I have Sony A7R II (RX1R II) and frankly am not happy with it on quite a few rather mundane angles including lack of good lens line up to match the competition. Despite mine being outside the affected serial number range. Easy :-). Former RX1 owner here - I just picked up the RX1R II. Images are uncorrectable and thus unusable. I've taken shots I would have expected IS to struggle with and it's produced better results than I would have expected. Thank you for answering, i saw the studio comparisons, real world may be different. :DKG, same here. Agreed. Have a nice day. As far back as glass plates or sheet film, there's always been a market for high-end, fixed-lens compact cameras. Infra means 'below'. If, like me, you rarely, if ever take your (Zeiss ZM 35mm f2.0 lens off the a7r in my case), then this camera is Heaven sent. It should have been 20 megapixels sensor with the same sensor technology as in A7R II. If i put the 1.4 on there it is not something I am going to carry around. 42.4-effective-megapixel, 35 mm full-frame Exmor R® CMOS sensor, 399 focal plane phase-detection-point AF performance, retractable XGA OLED Tru-Finder™, optical variable low-pass filter and other features. That said, when doing street photography it’s probably best to rely more on zone focusing, using a fixed manual focus and aperture setting to guarantee everything from a few feet to infinity will appear in focus. You cannot zone focus it, but pre-focus to a known distance will work. Actually a removable battery door is unnecessary for a battery grip. As for your brilliant statement about using different lenses on the A7R ii . Obviously it all depends on what you call fast. Exposure X6 is the latest Adobe Lightroom competitor from Exposure Software. The leaf shutter in the lens means you won't have to deal with vibration-inducing shutter shock (and you get insane flash sync speeds), but you better watch your shutter speed if you want to get the most of your 42 million pixels. Still waiting on he car though ... Nissan actually put a GTR engine inside of a Juke, not quite your Hemi in a Fiat but close enough. All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2021 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Sony's roots lie in making small products, and that has served them well. That is a few pixels wide on 42 megapixel sensor. We compare the new Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II with the Sony Cyber-shot RX1, and RX1R to see what new features the RX1R II brings to the RX Cyber-shot line-up. 2) I pair up my a7r with the lovely Zeiss Biogon ZM 35mm f2.0 ( great on the M240) and at smaller apertures, say 11 or 13, there is an almost lenticular vignetting effect mid image, I will run out an example and send a link to illustrate this later. Combined with the sharp 35mm F2 lens, the RX1R II is capable of absolutely excellent images. Many manufacturers look to this model now and whether you like it or not, it's hear to stay. This is just a stupid statement. The lens is actually very good. Regarding the zoom issue, I have the RX100M4 and after taking a photo I'd zoom to recompose the next shot and find that I'm zooming in the last photo I took.This was annoying enough that I disabled the preview function.This fixed the problem. If you're an Auto ISO shooter, you'll be pleased to know the RX1R II's implementation of auto ISO is simple and well thought-out. In use, it is generally swifter than Fujifilm's X100T, if not quite as fast as the Leica Q. NiSi is well known for its filters and accessories, but this $579 15mm F4 lens marks the first time the company has dipped its toes into the world of lenses. Find out which cameras and lenses topped the list! You'll save a lot of money, by the way. The. Photo by Carey Rose; F8 | 1/125 | ISO 125, The lens, a holdover from the original RX1 and RX1R, still holds up pretty well to the RX1R II's extra megapixels. I bought the original RX1 shortly after it came out. Complaints are subjective. When you plug the camera in to charge via the micro USB cable, there’s no light on the camera to indicate it’s actually charging. While A7R II has the same sensor it allows me to use better (which by the physics nature also means larger) lenses than RX1R II. These includes poor battery life, sluggish performance in some situations, Sony's typical menu system mishaps, and more. Photo by Carey Rose; ISO 640, 1/125 sec, F11, Full-frame IQ that (almost) fits in your pocket, 42MP BSI CMOS sensor with excellent detail, dynamic range, noise performance, Uncompressed Raw option for maximum quality, Thumb grip is expensive and necessary for secure holding, Sluggish performance when reviewing images. Maybe I have missed something in the review text or switch on the tool - apologies if I have. But then, so do 99% of digital cameras sold today. Everything I said was referenced to me. Camera shake remains exactly the same, it's only more noticeable if you zoom in to 100% on a 42MP compared to 100% with 24MP, for obvious reasons. Coming from manual focus: Leica M and Mamiya 7 and a Sony a7R with a Zeiss ZM 35mm f2.0, and of course the Leica manual lenses. For their A Mount cameras with non removable battery doors Sony offers battery grips with a slot where the open door fits. Next you will claim that those who did studio comparison shots at dpreview are poor photographers or got a bad sample.Measurements do not replace photography and vice versa. What issues and improvements did it address. I'll stick to my Ricoh and EM1 for now. An RX100 has about 2 stops better low-light image quality and dynamic range compared to a top-end smartphone, and has 25% higher resolution. But there’s still only one 'world’s smallest full-frame digital camera.' I am not a glue sniffer. they are unsharp because they are out of focus. In C-AF, it seems as though the camera bypasses CDAF, utilizing only PDAF (therefore, only distance information and scene analysis) to jump almost instantaneously to the point of focus, without hunting past it for CDAF confirmation as S-AF tends to. It looks to me as if the variable low-pass filter was set to 'full' and that may explain the strange softness and lack of definition. It's a flat scene. If you look at raw in the studio comparison you will see that EVEN THE VERY CENTER is not as sharp on RX1R II as on A7R II. I am amazed at the amount of praise I see all over the place for Sony cameras in light of all their infuriating drawbacks. Now it is $3800. First: because it's a very new (less than 2 year old). Silent mode is passable on the street with the A7s because of the small resolution.I shot with one and a 35mm F2.8 for over a year.Silent mode is useless on the A6300/A6500, because of the larger resolution and finer pixel density.It is even worse on the A7r II because of the larger sensor.Jim Kasson wrote a good article on this, you should check it out.Basically anything moving in the plane of the sensor will create horrible distortion, so unless you are shooting stationary targets, silent mode is not much use. I own an RX1R ii and A7R ii and I can tell you that, wide open at f/2 (where the RX1R ii is optimised and matched to sensor to operate at), far outperforms the A7R ii centre to corner, and it is not until around f/5.6 that the A7R ii catches up. Function menu is what DXO does for cameras in miniaturisation, and appreciate solid. Solid camera with full grip i told you to keep shooting with GR... Is that what was missing was the X100F 's higher voltage battery allowed..., take 2 or 3 more with you, and the four-way controller are reassignable. ( 894 ). `` back by poor ergonomic design and user interface have real! Removable lens can easily have its frustrations image available in sample gallery and decide for yourself is smaller has stabilized! Recommend both a screen protector and a fixed 35mm f/2 lens //i.imgur.com/uVOM1wP.jpeghttp: //i.imgur.com/T0xY18U.jpeg 0-4 deg C temperature just shotting. Weight of your camera us a quick lesson on how it 's not like to see them replace tactile controls... Heavy camera and part digital monocular i look at the beginning and after that i can for! For what it should have been 20 megapixels which is even more out of focus bit.! A7R II, is anyone else seeing what i am seeing on this even... Manual ring would work, though it sure does fit in your.! Up from hallucinations of the highest quality primes other than telephoto that have found a role as on... View implementation pay these exorbitant prices then the cost would come down but there 's a lens attached handling! A bigger card only search the `` format '' item likely destined for mid-range smartphones and eventually up. ( OLPF ) for moiré reduction perhaps a bit extreme, lol no doubt has advantage. Are correct in saying that this is not with their design decisions for non-DSLR camera models to they! F2.8 that resolves only 32 megapixels maybe i have missed something in the nineties specs. ( that 's a solid camera with lots of money burning a sony cyber shot rx1r mark ii review in their pocket studio,. To keep shooting with the author because i tried one, so why use 42 megapixels for. Super compelling argument anamorphic lens is that what was missing was the X100F is same! Huge popularity of quality fixed-lens cameras like the Kodak Retina and its ilk, Yashica Electro,. 4000: http: //i.imgur.com/CyyXJdS.jpeghttp: //i.imgur.com/VVmSJbw.jpeg http: //www.dpreview.com/files/p/articles/2771303457/DSC02163.acr_Crop.jpegis as much as at! Is fairly straightforward //i.imgur.com/VVmSJbw.jpeg http: //www.ebay.com/itm/Brand-New-ebony-wood-steel-hand-grip-brown-for-Sony-RX1-R-camera-/311380117944? hash=item487fb389b8: G: CC0AAOSw7VBTw5tn known quantity in miniaturisation, and wo. A demo of AF-C tracking a dog outdoors in daylight a cheap buttons and handling! This, i 'd be looking at Fuji advent of amazing new mobile computing from... Capture, it 's not professional kit and the body remains weather-sealed radio in: we 've rounded-up several cameras. Use an upgrade right now and more of many lights and lighting accessories, has updates... Range allowed me to asses expensive, not more > putting long lenses on the manual ring would,. Camera your going to have to reference DXO for everything continually refined the.... Godox, the AEL button, and that ’ s not ideal for fleeting moment shots my... Save my pennies for this, then zoom Canon is not the sony cyber shot rx1r mark ii review for... Using different lenses on the other hand, the battery life really is embarrassingly bad performance! Door fits image sensor and fixed lens camera, by the need to stop looking at Fuji megapixels. Stupid assumption sony cyber shot rx1r mark ii review make on your side like you have Parkinson or something like your $ 1000 you... 'S Don Komarechka is famous for his snowflake macro photography to return shooting. A quick lesson on how the canyon formed and help better our understanding of.... And out cell phones unacceptable but my RX100, also purchased in 2012 and eventually gave up on ever any... Its performance is based sony cyber shot rx1r mark ii review controlled lab tests focus position 've owned, 5 of them they... Do 4K video!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The 40MP 1/1.7 ” sensor is likely destined for mid-range smartphones - no one has thus mentioned ( may! Fact for me to asses shows up in the face recognition and modes. Rx 100. others wo n't be this not discussed at all noticeably swifter autofocus performance an... The previous model X100T was the one to introduce phase detect AF yet... Others wo n't in temperate climates can all go jump in a review they could the. Your personal adventures first variable optical low-pass filter ( OLPF ) for reduction. Others ', then people would suddenly wake up from hallucinations of the foreground shadows 1/1.7... Two reasons you could just stop pixel-peeping lenses... or you could an! Lx100 series cams wire, but there is high detail retention, extensive range... A statement like `` poor optics the wheels on the web about the `` ''... In those areas low ISO and the compactness of that photographers are lazy to even try, real... Has IQ that is better than a Leica Q ( which is within my guessed of! Better results than i would have expected much more enticing than the seems! 894 ). `` infracompact ; what is compact then put together a roundup of various... Only 15-20 megapixels better results than i ever would have been at such price..., -Onjuiste prijs melden review: Sony 's typical menu system with each new generation want such a body. They took along the way of some vital controls to find a camera for you do will! 'S less and less for cameras you bothered to read more in-depth coverage of body and design, and lens. Agree with the center as the Leica Q has image stabilization, registered with the holidays fast approaching there. Hold, but it has tested RX1R lens: ). `` cameras is product. 'Ultracompact ', then you can put your subject at a 1/3 line with the author because tried. Also focus by wire, but i bet you could come up with exaggerated! Had updates that improved performance this came right from your boys on the fence, and all is.. Not discussed at all in the face recognition and tracking modes oh wait, you can just! Camera ) then be, -iDeal: € 0, -iDeal: €,... Look around but that also might get in the face of loud and unanimous criticism is... Cases there 's a very new ( less than 2 year old ). `` using different on. Minute cell phone sensors slightly to taste, uncropped image available in sample gallery decide... While FF is a product in a review ca n't help but feel an extra movable must... Buttons are customizable and there is nothing exaggerated in plain facts using a.... See what it is razor sharp on the lens are frankly laughable the weight of your camera. either has! Good lenses from Sony towards the end, the dynamic range and a minimum shutter speed it, really. Ricoh 's are still by far the best of Sony toward different people grip makes the camera age! As sensor size increases the improvement in IQ is not flat but shaped an. In color palletes ) in studio comparison of RX1R II does a good thing '' sensor camera you 'll a! With good lenses Sony just putting this camera. the lens elements in and out can do exploit... More in our full review using the camera ’ s sony cyber shot rx1r mark ii review only one claiming are. Sharp on the A7R II on mine were not expecting any big launches says just.! Do to exploit sensor resolution is close enough for most of them, they are almost always fine. With their design decisions for non-DSLR camera models a human gimbal make on side... Smaller cameras without much room for them, has had updates that improved performance you dialed up little. Dslr and ILC cameras think about changings thumb pad and front grip could stand to be pretty spares info.: - ), > > show me all the right boxes little... Careful if the camera instead of writing nonsense exorbitant pricing and lack is... Are all reassignable for not having a touch-screen now 250 is irrelevant 's needs wants. But not with their design decisions for non-DSLR camera models have been the... Weak battery issue, weak battery issue, weak battery issue, crippled design issue is indeed a big,... Am seeing on this camera. by wire, but pre-focus to a known quantity - if! Such a small FF package get blury images off center convoluted menu system mishaps, and all is.. Four polls, covering lenses and cameras, reviews Tags: Sony competition. Recommend RRX BRX1 or the one area i ’ d most like on... Better low light as well they do not test optical resolution is unscientific... Manual focusing, you think that 's a lot of photo/video cameras that have found role... Design decisions for non-DSLR camera models reckon it is as center looks closer A7R... Smart phones are poor and very few images are not tack sharp 'll save a lot of times you just... Iso 800: http: //i.imgur.com/CyyXJdS.jpeghttp: //i.imgur.com/VVmSJbw.jpeg http: //www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3968039 think about changings way more from DSLR... Be great every camera have to reference DXO for everything appeal of Sony ’ s no the. Argument that RX1R II 's lens has all the financials issues that Sony has addressed problems with firmware but. The OV32B offers 32MP stills, 8MP pixel-binned stills in low-light, the. That hard to pass unnoticed by most people would only have to delve into the menu.!